12-01-31 Who controls the electronic records of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel? IBM?

The Israeli Courts Administration is asked to produce records, which document the identity of those, who hold the ultimate administrative authority for the servers of the Supreme Court.  The evidence so far would lead any reasonable person to conclude that it is NOT the Clerk of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel. In Israel computing and legal experts are willing to discuss the issues and propose solutions.
 [] [] 
Clerk of the Court Sarah Lifschitz; Director of the Courts Administration Judge Moshe Gal, Supreme Court of Israel

Jerusalem, January 31 – Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO), has forwarded to the Courts Administration a request for records, pertaining to the identity of those holding the ultimate administrative authority for the servers of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel. [1]

A series of reports, recently published online by Dr Zernik, has first shown a pattern of online publication of simulated records on the servers (ELYON1 and ELYON2), [2,3] and the failure and refusal of the Office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court to certify the Court’s own records. [4-6] Furthermore, ambiguity was shown in the identity certifications of the Supreme Court servers. [7]

The 2010 report of the Israeli Ombudsman Judge (Ret) Lindenstrauss, [8] raised serious concern regarding the integrity of the development and implementation of the computer systems of the Israeli courts as well.  Several corporations were involved in development with no bidding and with no core supervision by state employees.  The corporations were only identified in the Ombudsman’s report as A, B, and C.  Media identified the corporations: EDS, Teldor, and IBM Global Services[9-11]

“Today’s request attempts to establish, who indeed maintains and safeguards the integrity of the records of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel,” concludes Dr Zernik, “The evidence so far would lead any reasonable person to conclude that it is NOT the Clerk of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel.”

Dr Zernik had previously shown the refusal of the Clerk of the Los Angeles Superior Court and the Clerks of the US courts from coast to coast to certify their own decisions, orders, and judgments, which were published in the same courts’ online public access systems.  “Any court, where the Clerk refuses to certify the Court’s own records, is certified corrupt,” says Dr Zernik, “it is part of a global culture of Corporate-Government Criminality.” [12-13]

According to Dr Zernik, a critical difference between conditions in the US and in Israel is that in Israel, both computing and legal scholars are willing to discuss the problems and  propose solutions.  Legal and computing experts in the United States have consistently refused to opine on these matters. [14-16]

Integrity of the electronic record systems of the courts is critical in the safeguard of Human Rights and Socio-economic Development in the digital era.

Welcome to the Robber Baron Revival Era! Willkommen auf der neue Raubritter Zeit!
[1] 12-01-31 Request for records of Courts Administration, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (1988), pertaining to the ultimate administrative authority for the servers of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel
[2] 11-12-04 Simulated Records, Simulated Litigation Enabled by the Electronic Record Systems of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel (English)
[3] “Simulated litigation”, “simulated decisions”, “simulated service” here refer to conduct defined in the Texas Criminal Code as follows:
Texas Penal Code §32.48. SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS.
(a) A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment, or other court process with the intent to:
(1)  induce payment of a claim from another person;  or
(2)  cause another to:                           
(A)  submit to the putative authority of the document;  or
(B)  take any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document, in compliance with the document, or on the basis of the document.
(b)  Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a sufficient showing that the document was delivered.
[4] 12-01-17 Evolution of the Electronic Decision Forms of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel s (with Full Appendix: Summary Table, Survey Notes, Records)
[5] 12-01-25 Table Summary I: Clerk’s Certification, or Lack Thereof, in Judicial Records of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel (2000-2012) s
[6] 12-01-29 Table Summary II: Refusal of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel to Provide Clerk’s Certification of Decisions, Records of the Court s
[7] 12-01-30 Certificates, or lack thereof, for servers of the Supreme Court of Israel s
[8] 10-00-00 State of Israel – Ombudsman’s Report 60b, Ministry of Justice Computerization (2010) p 693 Et Seq
[9]10-10-19 Net Ha-Mishpat – State Ombudsman – A Project With No Bidding and No Supervision_ The Marker
[12] 10-08-18 Zernik, J: Data Mining of Online Judicial Records of the Networked US Federal Courts, International Journal on Social Media: Monitoring, Measurement, Mining, 1:69-83 (2010)
[13] 11-08-01 Zernik, J: Fraud and corruption in the US courts is tightly linked to failing banking regulation and the financial crisis, 16th World Criminology Congress presentation
[14] 10-04-25 Request and Refusal of Opinion Letter by Harvard Law School Dean Martha Minow in re: Alleged Fraud in PACER and CM/ECF
[15] 10-04-25 Request for Opinion by Yale Law School Faculty in re: Alleged Fraud in PACER and CM/ECF
[16] 11-04-14 PRESS RELEASE: Harvard Law Professor Yochai Benkler has been asked to review the evidence of large-scale computer fraud in the US courts
Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (NGO)
The 2010 submission of Human Rights Alert to the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations was reviewed by the HRC professional staff and incorporated in the official HRC Professional Staff Report with a note referring to “corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California.”
Flag Counter: 130
Total Reads: 715,060
Followers: 1,273
Total Reads: 14,459
Total Item Views: 664,803

Take away justice, then, and what are governments but great bandit bands?
Saint Augustine, Civitas Dei (City of God,4.4)
~ If it ain’t a Party, it ain’t my occupation ~

#OccuParty Jerusalem-AlQuds!
August 17, 2012
Love, Peace, Justice
Empowering the People through
a dance/music/art/study/pray
summer celebration

Facebook Event
Facebook Group:
From Jerusalem to the Wall Street Protesters: we must bring this Robber Baron Era to an end!
Boris announcing #Occupy Jerusalem-AlQuds – The Party, August 17, 2012
Guantanamera: From Jerusalem to Guantanamo Bay — the US has lost all credibility as a Civil Society
Oh My God, it’s Occupy Jerusalem-AlQuds!
Eje: Barcelona-Amsterdam; To: Jerusalem; Sobre: El Amor
Ship Commander Joan is Reassuring: We will be ready for takeoff on August 17, 2012


About josephsdream2012

Join us for a dream party in Summer 2012 in Jerusalem al-Quds: Love, Peace and Justice (dance/music/art/study/pray) Summer Celebration
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s